Skip to content

834 compatibility django52#835

Closed
d9pouces wants to merge 7 commits into
jazzband:masterfrom
d9pouces:834-compatibility-django52
Closed

834 compatibility django52#835
d9pouces wants to merge 7 commits into
jazzband:masterfrom
d9pouces:834-compatibility-django52

Conversation

@d9pouces
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

No description provided.

@codecov
Copy link
Copy Markdown

codecov Bot commented Apr 16, 2025

Codecov Report

❌ Patch coverage is 80.00000% with 1 line in your changes missing coverage. Please review.
✅ Project coverage is 82.51%. Comparing base (179313f) to head (b3fa383).
⚠️ Report is 20 commits behind head on master.

Files with missing lines Patch % Lines
pipeline/finders.py 80.00% 1 Missing ⚠️
Additional details and impacted files
@@            Coverage Diff             @@
##           master     #835      +/-   ##
==========================================
+ Coverage   82.50%   82.51%   +0.01%     
==========================================
  Files          33       33              
  Lines        1160     1161       +1     
==========================================
+ Hits          957      958       +1     
  Misses        203      203              

☔ View full report in Codecov by Sentry.
📢 Have feedback on the report? Share it here.

🚀 New features to boost your workflow:
  • ❄️ Test Analytics: Detect flaky tests, report on failures, and find test suite problems.
  • 📦 JS Bundle Analysis: Save yourself from yourself by tracking and limiting bundle sizes in JS merges.

@jdcarvalho
Copy link
Copy Markdown

Does anyone knows when the Django 5.2 will be supported by django-pipeline? The current PR is not validated?

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

2 participants